<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bless N° 37 New Sheheit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/07/31/bless-n%c2%b0-37-new-sheheit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/07/31/bless-n%c2%b0-37-new-sheheit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:41:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/07/31/bless-n%c2%b0-37-new-sheheit/comment-page-1/#comment-62806</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/?p=8672#comment-62806</guid>
		<description>There is only one thing I hate about BLESS it is their PRICE POINT.

Why so high? 
Is it made by virgin princesses in ivory towered sweat shops?
Or is it sewed with the silky golden threaded tears of &quot;she-he-it&quot;-maids that live by the golden sea?

Hilariously high prices great gear.................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is only one thing I hate about BLESS it is their PRICE POINT.</p>
<p>Why so high?<br />
Is it made by virgin princesses in ivory towered sweat shops?<br />
Or is it sewed with the silky golden threaded tears of &#8220;she-he-it&#8221;-maids that live by the golden sea?</p>
<p>Hilariously high prices great gear&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: German Design Company Produces 3-D Sweater - PSFK</title>
		<link>http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/07/31/bless-n%c2%b0-37-new-sheheit/comment-page-1/#comment-60638</link>
		<dc:creator>German Design Company Produces 3-D Sweater - PSFK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/?p=8672#comment-60638</guid>
		<description>[...] [via today and tomorrow] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via today and tomorrow] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chilligan</title>
		<link>http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/07/31/bless-n%c2%b0-37-new-sheheit/comment-page-1/#comment-60628</link>
		<dc:creator>Chilligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 06:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/?p=8672#comment-60628</guid>
		<description>What is that I&#039;m looking at. The sweaters are one thing, but damn... what&#039;s up with the slacks man?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is that I&#8217;m looking at. The sweaters are one thing, but damn&#8230; what&#8217;s up with the slacks man?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLESS x Oxbow - Skolpens new faces &#187; Post &#187; whats wrong with the zoo</title>
		<link>http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/07/31/bless-n%c2%b0-37-new-sheheit/comment-page-1/#comment-60622</link>
		<dc:creator>BLESS x Oxbow - Skolpens new faces &#187; Post &#187; whats wrong with the zoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/?p=8672#comment-60622</guid>
		<description>[...] to Pieter for the Tip &amp; Pictures.    Related [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Pieter for the Tip &amp; Pictures.    Related [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLESS x OXBOW - Skolpen mit neuem Gesicht &#187; Beitrag &#187; whats wrong with the zoo</title>
		<link>http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/07/31/bless-n%c2%b0-37-new-sheheit/comment-page-1/#comment-60621</link>
		<dc:creator>BLESS x OXBOW - Skolpen mit neuem Gesicht &#187; Beitrag &#187; whats wrong with the zoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/?p=8672#comment-60621</guid>
		<description>[...] an Pieter für Tip &amp; Bilder.    Ähnliche [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an Pieter für Tip &amp; Bilder.    Ähnliche [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith</title>
		<link>http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/07/31/bless-n%c2%b0-37-new-sheheit/comment-page-1/#comment-60620</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/?p=8672#comment-60620</guid>
		<description>Alyse, it´s an interesting aspect you´re coming up with.

But honestly, it´s really hard for me to see the strong connection you´re placing emphasis on.
I know and adore both labels and both collections. Each is great, unique and strong.

But it´s pretty obvious that we see two different labels with completely different orientations, target groups and markets. And two different collection names.
Apart from that,  &quot;New Shit&quot; is very zeitgeist, but in no case an extraordinary neologism. 

When i first saw the &quot;New Sheheit&quot; collection and press text, i spent not one single thought about the -maybe mistakable - introductory phrase, but completely got the collection´s conclusion: &quot;the pronounced unimportance of gender difference&quot;. 

So maybe, a little bit more trust into the intelligence and awareness of writers, clients and end customers might be helpful.
From an objective, impartial point of view, there´s a big difference between &quot;New Shit&quot; and &quot;New Sheheit&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alyse, it´s an interesting aspect you´re coming up with.</p>
<p>But honestly, it´s really hard for me to see the strong connection you´re placing emphasis on.<br />
I know and adore both labels and both collections. Each is great, unique and strong.</p>
<p>But it´s pretty obvious that we see two different labels with completely different orientations, target groups and markets. And two different collection names.<br />
Apart from that,  &#8220;New Shit&#8221; is very zeitgeist, but in no case an extraordinary neologism. </p>
<p>When i first saw the &#8220;New Sheheit&#8221; collection and press text, i spent not one single thought about the -maybe mistakable &#8211; introductory phrase, but completely got the collection´s conclusion: &#8220;the pronounced unimportance of gender difference&#8221;. </p>
<p>So maybe, a little bit more trust into the intelligence and awareness of writers, clients and end customers might be helpful.<br />
From an objective, impartial point of view, there´s a big difference between &#8220;New Shit&#8221; and &#8220;New Sheheit&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyse</title>
		<link>http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/07/31/bless-n%c2%b0-37-new-sheheit/comment-page-1/#comment-60588</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/?p=8672#comment-60588</guid>
		<description>I was not referring to the collection itself, but to the idea of how they named the collection (which I think is still an important part of the collection).  

If the &quot;idea&quot; was Sheheit and not a derivative of New Shit, then why the name &quot;New Sheheit&quot; and not just &quot;Sheheit&quot; or some other clever name like Holy Sheheit?

Their explanation as posted on their website:
&quot;What could be read fast as &quot;new shit&quot; is with a closer look aswell the definition of the eternal Bless way: the pronounced unimportance of gender difference.
Bless clothes fit as always according to everyones need to all 3 genders, including things.&quot;

Following that logic I could name a new design blog todayandtwomoreoh.com and claim it as an original idea. 

also finding the reference to a third gender as a little odd and unprogressive.  

best of luck to Bless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not referring to the collection itself, but to the idea of how they named the collection (which I think is still an important part of the collection).  </p>
<p>If the &#8220;idea&#8221; was Sheheit and not a derivative of New Shit, then why the name &#8220;New Sheheit&#8221; and not just &#8220;Sheheit&#8221; or some other clever name like Holy Sheheit?</p>
<p>Their explanation as posted on their website:<br />
&#8220;What could be read fast as &#8220;new shit&#8221; is with a closer look aswell the definition of the eternal Bless way: the pronounced unimportance of gender difference.<br />
Bless clothes fit as always according to everyones need to all 3 genders, including things.&#8221;</p>
<p>Following that logic I could name a new design blog todayandtwomoreoh.com and claim it as an original idea. </p>
<p>also finding the reference to a third gender as a little odd and unprogressive.  </p>
<p>best of luck to Bless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ornament and crime</title>
		<link>http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/07/31/bless-n%c2%b0-37-new-sheheit/comment-page-1/#comment-60585</link>
		<dc:creator>ornament and crime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 23:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/?p=8672#comment-60585</guid>
		<description>Hipster shite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hipster shite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pieter &#124; today and tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/07/31/bless-n%c2%b0-37-new-sheheit/comment-page-1/#comment-60584</link>
		<dc:creator>pieter &#124; today and tomorrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/?p=8672#comment-60584</guid>
		<description>@Alyse
You know that the collection of Bless is for al 3 genders ... She He It?
I can&#039;t see any resemblance to Wendy&amp;Jim ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alyse<br />
You know that the collection of Bless is for al 3 genders &#8230; She He It?<br />
I can&#8217;t see any resemblance to Wendy&#038;Jim &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyse</title>
		<link>http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/07/31/bless-n%c2%b0-37-new-sheheit/comment-page-1/#comment-60583</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/?p=8672#comment-60583</guid>
		<description>The original idea for &quot;New Sheheit&quot; the collection name, is from Wendy&amp;Jim &quot;New Shit&quot; a spring/summer 2007 collection.  Bless is notorious in the fashion world for &quot;knocking off&quot; ideas &amp; it&#039;s getting a little old.  Still waiting to see an original idea from Bless...

In the meantime, to check out Wendy&amp;Jim http://www.wujsympathisant.com/

Their fresh ideas are very clearly and cleanly expressed, and the label is one of my favorites.  The naming of collections is always interesting.  &quot;New Shit&quot; was a cool idea when it was new, and I had always wanted one of their New Shit t-shirts.  Also very cool is the name of their new denim line, New H Denim.  NewH instead of New Age, simple</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original idea for &#8220;New Sheheit&#8221; the collection name, is from Wendy&amp;Jim &#8220;New Shit&#8221; a spring/summer 2007 collection.  Bless is notorious in the fashion world for &#8220;knocking off&#8221; ideas &amp; it&#8217;s getting a little old.  Still waiting to see an original idea from Bless&#8230;</p>
<p>In the meantime, to check out Wendy&amp;Jim <a href="http://www.wujsympathisant.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wujsympathisant.com/</a></p>
<p>Their fresh ideas are very clearly and cleanly expressed, and the label is one of my favorites.  The naming of collections is always interesting.  &#8220;New Shit&#8221; was a cool idea when it was new, and I had always wanted one of their New Shit t-shirts.  Also very cool is the name of their new denim line, New H Denim.  NewH instead of New Age, simple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
